Millions of Reasons to Pass HB 335

Current state law requires all cities, counties, school districts, and special districts in Texas to purchase advertising space in print newspapers to publicize their public notices. House Bill 335 would relax that requirement to allow local governments to post public notices online instead of in print, potentially saving taxpayers millions of dollars every year.    To better illustrate the savings at stake, we decided to submit Public Information Act requests to the top 5 counties, cities, and school districts in Texas asking them for the following information:   “…the total amount expended by [NAME OF LOCAL ENTITY] for newspaper ads for public notices for the fiscal year of 2012.”     Here is what we found:   Local Govt. FY 2012 Estimate City of Dallas $3,018 City of Fort Worth $17,274 City of Austin $30,069 Tarrant County $49,216 Travis County $64,485 Harris County $266,146[i] Bexar County $276,601 Dallas County $350,480 Fort Worth ISD $12,953 Austin ISD $45,244 Dallas ISD $75,762 Northside ISD $81,324 Houston ISD $291,561 TOTAL $1.56 million     According to James Quintero, TPPF’s Sr. Fiscal Policy Analyst who testified recently to the House Committee on Technology on this issue: “As you can see from the totals listed above, local governments around the state are incurring annual expenses for advertising that run into the millions. For just the [13] cities, counties, and school districts listed above, the total amounts to [$1.56] million. These are resources that are not available to schools, roads, libraries, or any other purpose—but they could be.”     [i] Harris County’s response to the open records request could not be tabulated before the committee hearing.

Press Release March 25, 2013

TUESDAY: Texas Public Policy Foundation joins The Heritage Foundation on “The Urgency for School Choice in Texas”

AUSTIN – The Texas Public Policy Foundation and The Heritage Foundation will host a panel discussion and luncheon concerning school choice in Texas on Tuesday, March 26, at the Stephen F. Austin Intercontinental Hotel. The Honorable Jim DeMint, president of The Heritage Foundation and former United States Senator, will be a featured speaker and participant. ...

Press Release March 22, 2013

Texas Pummels California in Latest Jobs Report

The Bureau of Labor Statistics today released state employment and unemployment data for January 2013, and we took the liberty of comparing the nation’s two economic heavyweights, Texas and California, to see who outperformed who. The winner is clear.    Two-year trend        From Jan. 2011 to Jan. 2013, California added 488,600 jobs.      From Jan. 2011 to Jan. 2013, Texas added 581,300 jobs.   One-year trend       From Jan. 2012 to Jan. 2013, California added 254,900 jobs.       From Jan. 2012 to Jan. 2013, Texas added 310,900 jobs.     Unemployment          California is tied with Rhode Island for having the highest unemployment rate: 9.8 percent,       unchanged from last month.       Texas’ unemployment rate is: 6.3 percent, up from 6.2 percent in December, even as Texas         added 10,400 jobs in January and California added 1,700 jobs.     To show how remarkable Texas’ numbers are, consider this: California has a civilian labor force of 18,591,111 while Texas has a labor force of 12,680,661. This means that California has a workforce that’s 47 percent larger than Texas’ but Texas created 19 percent more jobs in the past 2 years and 22 percent more jobs in the past year!   Texas again proves that its model of low taxes and limited government is a success.    

Press Release March 18, 2013

Texas Pummels California in Latest Jobs Report

The Bureau of Labor Statistics today released state employment and unemployment data for January 2013, and we took the liberty of comparing the nation’s two economic heavyweights, Texas and California, to see who outperformed who. The winner is clear.    Two-year trend        From Jan. 2011 to Jan. 2013, California added 488,600 jobs.      From Jan. 2011 to Jan. 2013, Texas added 581,300 jobs.   One-year trend       From Jan. 2012 to Jan. 2013, California added 254,900 jobs.       From Jan. 2012 to Jan. 2013, Texas added 310,900 jobs.     Unemployment          California is tied with Rhode Island for having the highest unemployment rate: 9.8 percent,       unchanged from last month.       Texas’ unemployment rate is: 6.3 percent, up from 6.2 percent in December, even as Texas         added 10,400 jobs in January and California added 1,700 jobs.     To show how remarkable Texas’ numbers are, consider this: California has a civilian labor force of 18,591,111 while Texas has a labor force of 12,680,661. This means that California has a workforce that’s 47 percent larger than Texas’ but Texas created 19 percent more jobs in the past 2 years and 22 percent more jobs in the past year!   Texas again proves that its model of low taxes and limited government is a success.    

Press Release March 18, 2013

Texas Public Policy Foundation energy and environmental expert to participate on Conservative Political Action Conference panel

AUSTIN – The Texas Public Policy Foundation’s Kathleen Hartnett White, Distinguished Senior Fellow and Director of the Armstrong Center for Energy and the Environment, will speak on the “Individuals, Liberty, and the Environment: Seizing the Environmental Issue” panel at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Friday, March 15, 2013, at 10:30 a.m.   “Conservatives need to reclaim...

Press Release March 14, 2013

When Will Learning’s Tomorrow Come?

This blog post originally appeared on The Huffington Post on 3/4/2013.   What enables you to read this blog post? Your desktop PC? A smart phone? A tablet computer? However you've stumbled across this, odds are it was not in some printed binding of The Huffington Post's latest blog entries.  You probably do much of your reading on monitors and touchscreens, and that makes complete sense. It's 2013, and though we're not where popular science fiction of the 20th century had us (Skynet has mercifully not become self-aware... yet), our capacity to access and disseminate data has experienced two decades worth of revolution in growth of scope. As much makes Sugata Mitra's TED Prize wish -- that we build a school in the digital cloud, a "Self-Organized Learning Environment" (SOLE) in which children can teach themselves and each other -- a completely reasonable, and important, goal. The potential of collaborative, technologically-driven learning environments to drive success in education lies in their capacity to create community. Dr. Mitra's formula of broadband + collaboration + encouragement and admiration is an effort to create a community for a student that is highly favorable toward and supportive of learning. Education research indicates that such environments can have a positively significant impact on a student's education outcomes than any other factor. What concerns me as an education reformer about Dr. Mitra's aspirational position is just that: it is still highly aspirational. Why, when we have such incredible technological resources at our disposal, have we been so slow to implement technology in many of our schools? The barriers vary. In some areas, especially poorer and more remote ones, funding and infrastructure are a challenge that must be overcome. Here, where we have an abundance of both those things, a very different barrier exists. It's one that should be beatable and yet remains a serious obstacle to any education reform, technology-driven or otherwise: fear of change. Dr. Mitra's assertion that our school system is out of date rings especially true in the United States. As much shows in our slipping global education rank; according to the Economist Intelligence Unit, we now treat our students to the 17th best education in the world. Among OECD countries, our math testing scores dipped to 25th out of 34 countries in 2009. Those are not terribly impressive numbers for a global superpower. In spite of this, we remain largely committed to an education model implemented during the Cold War. Students come to school for 6 or 7 hours a day. Teachers talk at them. They go home. While lectures have their merits, this environment hardly mirrors the modern working world, of which technology usage is often a major part. Many American students use computers and smartphones daily. Exploiting these technologies in the learning environment -- technologies with which today's learners almost innately engage -- is vital to the construction of the learning environments Dr. Mitra aspires to create. Some states, like Florida and Utah, have embraced learning technologies and seen them flourish. In 2010-2011, the Florida Virtual School served over 148,000 students. Other states have been slower. In Texas, where I'm from, we have been hearing that learning technologies are the future of education for a decade. Yet efforts to expand such technologies are frequently met with so much caution from members of the education establishment that the inertia becomes too much to overcome. While caution is necessary in any decision that affects the education of our next generation is important, so is boldness. The idea that students can use technology to self-teach is bold. The notion of a network of educators working together to bring high quality learning opportunities to children worldwide is bold. The SOLE is the kind of idea our education communities should be embracing to modernize global education. The wonderful thing about technology is that it can work fast. Dr. Mitra's idea, with enough buy in from the education community as well as those among us who might have knowledge worth sharing with today's students, could be implemented quickly. Quickness to embrace such ideas, to use the technology at its disposal, has not always come easily to the education community, especially in the United States. A willingness to do so, to be bold, will be key in the execution of Dr. Mitra's vision. A vision with the potential enhance learning opportunities for students the world over.  

Press Release March 5, 2013