TPPF experts publish article in the Texas Tech Administrative Law Journal

AUSTIN – Texas Public Policy Foundation experts Kathleen Hartnett White and Josiah Neeley co-authored an article in the latest issue of the Texas Tech Administrative Law Journal. The article, Who Regulates the Regulator? Cost-Effectiveness Analysis In Texas State Agency Rulemaking, 14 Tex. Tech Admin. L. J. 401 (2013), examines how appropriately structured regulatory impact analysis can increase...

Press Release September 11, 2013

Will Australia’s Elections Doom the Carbon Tax?

Conservatives won a landslide victory this weekend in Australia. A coalition of the Liberal and National parties (which in Australian terms are the right of center political parties) led by Tony Abbott won 88 seats in Australia’s 150 seat parliament, against 57 seats by left-wing Labor Party. One key factor behind this electoral victory was the unpopularity of Australia’s new carbon tax scheme, which had been instituted under the previous Labor government. Incoming Prime Minister Tony Abbott has pledged to repeal the carbon tax, and even Labor leader Kevin Rudd campaigned on a promise to convert it into a cap-and-trade system. The election is important to America because of what is says about the political viability of carbon taxes. In fact, as Robert Murphy of the Institute for Energy Research has noted, Australia’s carbon tax experience casts doubt on many of the claims made in favor of a carbon tax. Both electricity prices and unemployment spiked in Australia after its carbon tax was introduced, without any comparable environmental benefit: [T]he promises of those calling for a “pro-growth” U.S. carbon tax have been proven to be utterly false in Australia: Its carbon tax came with income tax increases and fewer jobs as well as morecommand-and-control energy regulations. The debate over a carbon tax is now not just one of theoretical speculation; proponents need to explain why the U.S. outcome would be different from what actually happened in Australia.

Press Release September 9, 2013

Federal Over-Reach in Louisiana

Last week, the U.S. Justice Department filed suit against the state of Louisiana over its education scholarship program, claiming that as much “impeded the desegregation process” in Louisiana public schools under federal orders to desegregate. From the New Orleans Times-Picayune: Thirty-four school systems could be affected, including those of Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. John the Baptist and St. Tammany parishes. Under the lawsuit, the state would be barred from assigning students in those systems  to private schools unless a federal judge agreed to it. A court hearing is tentatively set for Sept. 19. These are treacherous waters. Mandatory racial segregation, especially within our education system, was a shameful practice and represents a dark period in our country’s proud history. Parents of all races and classes should have the right to send their child to any school they want. That’s what desegregation in our education system should ultimately be about. Unfortunately, this lawsuit, even though its heart (for lack of better phrasing) may be in the right place, seems to run counter to the notion of freedom of choice in in our school systems: The Justice Department's primary argument is that letting students leave for vouchered private schools can disrupt the racial balance in public school systems that desegregation orders are meant to protect. Those orders almost always set rules for student transfers with the school system. The danger here lies in putting an ideal vision of the public school system over the good of students themselves. That is the potential harm in this lawsuit, regardless of one’s opinion on education scholarships or what the federal government’s role in education should be. Is limiting the freedom of parents and students to attend a school that best suits their needs going to enhance equality, or quality for that matter, in our education system? A final note: this lawsuit also demonstrates one of the drawbacks of statewide education scholarship programs, which is to say legal vulnerability. Over the last few years, several of the country’s larger choice programs—Indiana’s, New Hampshire’s, and Louisiana even before the federal suit—have faced litigation, though more commonly from within their own state rather than from the DOJ. Indiana successfully defended their program. New Hampshire and Louisiana have thus far been less successful in doing so. States considering the implementation of such programs in the future (hopefully including Texas) should be very careful when designing such a program to reduce the risk of legal challenge. The opponents of school choice are numerous and motivated, a fact that education reformers should always keep in mind. 

Press Release August 27, 2013

TPPF policy brief shows Texas homeowners’ insurance complaints at 15-year low

AUSTIN – The Texas Public Policy Foundation’s Mario Loyola has been named Chief Counsel. He will help oversee the Foundation’s work advancing liberty through the courts, including constitutional litigation. Loyola joined the Foundation in July 2010 as founding Director of the Center for Tenth Amendment Studies, focusing on energy and environment, healthcare, and other federalism...

Press Release August 14, 2013

ICYMI: Comptroller Combs on FBN Discussing How to Prevent a Detroit-Like Implosion Here in Texas

In case you missed it, Texas Comptroller Susan Combs was recently on Fox Business discussing Detroit’s fiscal implosion and whether there are cities in the Lone Star State faced with similar budgetary challenges.  More from the interview: Interviewer: Are certain Texas cities in trouble? Combs: Houston. Houston has a problem. And Houston has unfunded liabilities in the billions… Click here to watch the full video.  

Press Release August 5, 2013

ICYMI: Comptroller Combs on FBN Discussing How to Prevent a Detroit-Like Implosion Here in Texas

In case you missed it, Texas Comptroller Susan Combs was recently on Fox Business discussing Detroit’s fiscal implosion and whether there are cities in the Lone Star State faced with similar budgetary challenges.  More from the interview: Interviewer: Are certain Texas cities in trouble? Combs: Houston. Houston has a problem. And Houston has unfunded liabilities in the billions… Click here to watch the full video.  

Press Release August 5, 2013